-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Enhance cachePurgeMosaic to remove mosaic256 as well #81
Enhance cachePurgeMosaic to remove mosaic256 as well #81
Conversation
WalkthroughThe changes in this pull request focus on the Changes
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 2
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: ASSERTIVE
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
src/cache.mjs
(1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
src/cache.mjs (1)
40-40
: Verify impact of async signature change
The function signature change from sync to async requires verification of all calling code to ensure proper async/await usage.
✅ Verification successful
Function is exported but appears unused in the codebase
The function cachePurgeMosaic
is exported from cache.mjs
but there are no detectable imports or usages of this function in the current codebase. Since this is a newly added async function with no current consumers, there's no risk of breaking existing functionality.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for all calls to cachePurgeMosaic to verify they handle the async nature
rg "cachePurgeMosaic\(" --type js --type ts -B 2 -A 2
# Search for any error handling related to mosaic cache operations
rg "catch.*mosaic" --type js --type ts -B 2 -A 2
Length of output: 106
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Try a broader search for the function name without parentheses
rg "cachePurgeMosaic" --type js --type ts -B 2 -A 2
# Search for exports of the function to track usage
ast-grep --pattern 'export { $$$, cachePurgeMosaic, $$$ }'
# Search for imports of the function to track usage
ast-grep --pattern 'import { $$$, cachePurgeMosaic, $$$ }'
Length of output: 513
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for any file importing from cache.mjs
rg "from ['\"].*cache.mjs['\"]" --type js --type ts -B 1 -A 3
# Look for the function definition to understand its usage context
rg "function cachePurgeMosaic" --type js --type ts -B 5 -A 10
Length of output: 131
Co-authored-by: coderabbitai[bot] <136622811+coderabbitai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 2
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: ASSERTIVE
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
src/cache.mjs
(1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
src/cache.mjs (2)
40-54
: Robust implementation with proper error handling and parallel operations.
The enhanced implementation correctly handles both mosaic directories with proper error handling and parallel operations. The recreation of directories maintains consistency with cacheInit
.
40-54
: Verify consistency of mosaic directory handling.
The changes align well with the existing mosaicTilesIterable
function which already handles both mosaic directories. Let's verify that all other functions in the codebase consistently handle both directories.
✅ Verification successful
Based on the search results, I can now generate the final response as we have comprehensive evidence about the mosaic directory handling across the codebase.
Directory handling for both mosaic caches is consistent across the codebase
The changes to cachePurgeMosaic
are well-aligned with the codebase's handling of both mosaic directories. All relevant files consistently handle both __mosaic__
and __mosaic256__
directories:
src/mosaic.mjs
: Properly uses both directories for tile operationssrc/cache.mjs
: Consistently initializes and manages both directoriessrc/mosaic_cache_invalidation_job.mjs
: Correctly handles cache invalidation for both directories__tests__/mosaic.mjs
: Tests cover operations on both directories
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for any other functions that might need to handle both mosaic directories
rg -l "__mosaic__" | xargs rg "__mosaic256__"
# Search for any potential configuration files that might list these directories
fd -e json -e yaml -e config | xargs rg "mosaic.*256"
Length of output: 2656
https://kontur.fibery.io/Tasks/Task/Mosaic-cache-reset-endpoint-should-reset-256px-tiles-too-20065
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
__mosaic__
and__mosaic256__
directories asynchronously, improving cached data management.Bug Fixes