Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Enhance cachePurgeMosaic to remove mosaic256 as well #81

Merged

Conversation

dqunbp
Copy link
Collaborator

@dqunbp dqunbp commented Nov 27, 2024

https://kontur.fibery.io/Tasks/Task/Mosaic-cache-reset-endpoint-should-reset-256px-tiles-too-20065

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Enhanced the cache purging functionality to remove both __mosaic__ and __mosaic256__ directories asynchronously, improving cached data management.
  • Bug Fixes

    • Improved error handling in the cache management process, ensuring robust performance.

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Nov 27, 2024

Walkthrough

The changes in this pull request focus on the src/cache.mjs file, specifically enhancing the cachePurgeMosaic function. This function has been converted from synchronous to asynchronous, allowing it to await the removal of directories. It now purges both __mosaic__ and __mosaic256__ directories recursively in one call. Other functions, such as cacheGet and cacheInit, remain unchanged in structure and functionality.

Changes

File Change Summary
src/cache.mjs Changed cachePurgeMosaic from synchronous to asynchronous; now removes __mosaic__ and __mosaic256__ directories recursively. Other functions remain unchanged.

Poem

In the burrow where caches lay,
A rabbit hops, clearing the way.
With async magic, directories flee,
Purging the old, setting data free!
Two paths now clear, with a swift little dash,
Hooray for the changes, let’s make a splash! 🐇✨


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 2

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: ASSERTIVE

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 60660c5 and 101c447.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • src/cache.mjs (1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
src/cache.mjs (1)

40-40: Verify impact of async signature change

The function signature change from sync to async requires verification of all calling code to ensure proper async/await usage.

✅ Verification successful

Function is exported but appears unused in the codebase

The function cachePurgeMosaic is exported from cache.mjs but there are no detectable imports or usages of this function in the current codebase. Since this is a newly added async function with no current consumers, there's no risk of breaking existing functionality.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for all calls to cachePurgeMosaic to verify they handle the async nature
rg "cachePurgeMosaic\(" --type js --type ts -B 2 -A 2

# Search for any error handling related to mosaic cache operations
rg "catch.*mosaic" --type js --type ts -B 2 -A 2

Length of output: 106


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Try a broader search for the function name without parentheses
rg "cachePurgeMosaic" --type js --type ts -B 2 -A 2

# Search for exports of the function to track usage
ast-grep --pattern 'export { $$$, cachePurgeMosaic, $$$ }'

# Search for imports of the function to track usage
ast-grep --pattern 'import { $$$, cachePurgeMosaic, $$$ }'

Length of output: 513


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for any file importing from cache.mjs
rg "from ['\"].*cache.mjs['\"]" --type js --type ts -B 1 -A 3

# Look for the function definition to understand its usage context
rg "function cachePurgeMosaic" --type js --type ts -B 5 -A 10

Length of output: 131

src/cache.mjs Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Co-authored-by: coderabbitai[bot] <136622811+coderabbitai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 2

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: ASSERTIVE

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 101c447 and 53c9a54.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • src/cache.mjs (1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
src/cache.mjs (2)

40-54: Robust implementation with proper error handling and parallel operations.

The enhanced implementation correctly handles both mosaic directories with proper error handling and parallel operations. The recreation of directories maintains consistency with cacheInit.


40-54: Verify consistency of mosaic directory handling.

The changes align well with the existing mosaicTilesIterable function which already handles both mosaic directories. Let's verify that all other functions in the codebase consistently handle both directories.

✅ Verification successful

Based on the search results, I can now generate the final response as we have comprehensive evidence about the mosaic directory handling across the codebase.

Directory handling for both mosaic caches is consistent across the codebase

The changes to cachePurgeMosaic are well-aligned with the codebase's handling of both mosaic directories. All relevant files consistently handle both __mosaic__ and __mosaic256__ directories:

  • src/mosaic.mjs: Properly uses both directories for tile operations
  • src/cache.mjs: Consistently initializes and manages both directories
  • src/mosaic_cache_invalidation_job.mjs: Correctly handles cache invalidation for both directories
  • __tests__/mosaic.mjs: Tests cover operations on both directories
🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for any other functions that might need to handle both mosaic directories
rg -l "__mosaic__" | xargs rg "__mosaic256__"

# Search for any potential configuration files that might list these directories
fd -e json -e yaml -e config | xargs rg "mosaic.*256"

Length of output: 2656

src/cache.mjs Show resolved Hide resolved
src/cache.mjs Show resolved Hide resolved
@dqunbp dqunbp merged commit 7a11016 into main Nov 27, 2024
3 checks passed
@dqunbp dqunbp deleted the 20065-mosaic-cache-reset-endpoint-should-reset-256px-tiles-too branch November 27, 2024 11:20
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants